Keane read emails addressed to Drblik that went unanswered and later alleged that Makula attempted to file a restraining order against her in their pending legal case in an effort to prevent her from voting down the tax abatement once again. Olson reiterated her desire to see the hiring freeze lifted and to move forward with appointing a seventh trustee, then asked for it to be put on the April agenda. The temporary hiring freeze is anything but a temporary hiring freeze.” Her lack of addressing the hiring issues, the lack of compromising when it comes to appointing a seventh board member or anything having to do with money, such as the budget, the (tax) levy or the amount that is being spent on legal fees is mind-boggling. Everybody who complained that I was running for a second term, that’s why. “When a particular board member got reelected I had no choice,” Rozanski said. Rozanski clarified her statement was directed at the board’s “main officers,” not including herself as the vice president. “To say I’m disappointed in our president doesn’t begin to cover how I truly feel,” Rozanski said.ĭrblik interjected, saying that Rozanski couldn’t make comments disparaging individual trustees and that criticism had to be general. After it ended, Rozanski opened the penultimate item on the agenda - “Other” - by blasting the opposing voting bloc, and specifically, Drblik. Later, the board moved into an executive session that lasted roughly two hours. The board then voted 6-0 in favor of approving the contract. ![]() ![]() Makula cited current inflation levels and suggested the board should approve the contract, estimating that it costs around $85 per week. I’m not in agreement, especially with the terms, and the fact that it’s a three-year contract.” “Has the attorney reviewed the terms?” Drblik asked the board.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |